Alpha Master Pimp Sir Ez

    Loading...

    Gender: Male
    Location: Hell (DC) from ATL
    Quote: It's all about respect... "I like my friends like good tissue, soft to the touch but strong enough to deal with some real ****"
    Relationship: Swinger
    Orientation: Straight
    Children: Proud Parent
    # of Kids: 1
    Body Type: Some extra baggage
    Height: 6'1"
    Religion: Mind Your Own Business
    Ethnicity: Other
    Yahoo: Master Pimp Ez
    About Me: I am alot of things to alot of people. I am a Dominant n the BDSM lifestyle, poet, Stage Tech, Drummer/Percussionist, Freelance Hustler, Spiritual Mystic, Vocalist, And a rach of other things I do...lol I am a black Forest Gump.
    Music: I'm all over the spectrum but it's all fucnky...
    Movies: I been in a few
    TV: I don't watch TV much. I KNOW what it can do to your mind.
    Books: I love that deep stuff
    Likes: I like big butts and I can not lie... And little butts too.
    Dislikes: Sneaky people who lie. People who think they **** don't stank or think I need to be like them to be more real than them.
    Hobbies: I lead the Drum Circle @ Malcom X park (Meriidian Hills NW DC) And a few other things.
    Vices: I am down for folks who are down for me too. I'm real, and I am not normal...lol
    Best Friends
  • Ed Lover, 45
    Ed Lover

  • New Friends
  • Janet and Nut, 40
    Janet
    and Nut

  • michelle, 33
    michelle

  • Ed Lover, 45
    Ed Lover

  • MARLEY,
    MARLEY

  • DJ Spinbad, 25
    DJ
    Spinbad

  • Q, 26
    Q

  • DJ SUSS.ONE, 29
    DJ
    SUSS.ONE

    Even the governor knows more anout monogamy?

    Tuesday, March 11, 2008, 04:26 PM [General]

    Respecting the relationship in your lifestyle?
    Respecting the relationship in your lifestyle? magnify
    These lifestyles are a direct reflection of the life you live
    You do not have to be in these lifestyles
    You first have to have a life
    And a direction built on a stable image as to what you want out of your life

    But there are too many choices
    There are too many advertisements
    There are too many distraction
    And there is too much time to dream

    What do you want out of your life?
    What do you want to offer others in your life?
    What do you want out of others in your life?
    What is your purpose in these lifestyles of your life?

    Monogamy?



    I spent a great deal of time reading Teal's page
    She has a way of provoking good topics through sexuality
    And she has some sexy ass nipples too
    *wicked grin*

    But I think that many of you need to learn more about what you are doing or not doing right in your life
    And how it effects your lifestyle as well

    And then maybe you can better seek what you lust for out of these lifestyles
    Because all they offer you is style
    But if you have no real respect for life it's self?
    You can not have what you do not respect

    Monogamy
    Monogamy is the custom or condition of having only one mate in a relationship, thus forming a couple. The word monogamy comes from the Greek word monos, which means one or alone, and the Greek word gamos, which means marriage or union.

    Serial monogamy is having no more than one sexual partner at a time but allows for multiple partners in a lifetime. In western culture serial monogamy is common with individuals before they start a family, due to divorce rates.

    Monogamy is one of several mating systems observed in animals. The amount of social monogamy in animals varies across taxa, with over 90 percent of birds engaging in social monogamy but only 7 percent of mammals engaging in social monogamy.

    The incidence of sexual monogamy appears quite rare in the animal kingdom. It is becoming clear that even animals that are socially monogamous engage in extra-pair copulations.



    With this description?
    Having ONE means you ONLY have ONE
    Ever!

    But that is not how many of you are today
    The real issue is how many of you
    Do not know the real definition of what you call your own acts

    Most of you are not Monogamous
    You are serial monogamous
    And the only reason why so many of you do not call what you are
    And what you do
    Serial monogamy
    Is because you do not know what it is
    Or what's the difference

    Serial monogamy is characterized by a series of long- or short-term, exclusive sexual relationships entered into consecutively over the lifespan. In common usage partners need not be married, but there is never more than one partner at a time. This behavior is a variant of monogamy, in which a given individual has only one sexual partner throughout life. This behavior is sometimes referred to as a form of, or replacement for, polygamy. However, this practice inherently excludes the practice of having multiple simultaneous sexual partners.
    Meaning?
    Generally, any animals that do not mate with one partner for life can be considered serially monogamous, including those who find a second mate only upon the death of the first.

    There are arguments that evolutionary biology has selected a four-year mating cycle for humans based on natural birth spacing, as well as the belief that finding a 'fully' monogamous species is rare.

    Within Western culture, serial monogamy is considered more fundamental than "full" monogamy. Relatively few people consciously enter a long-term relationship wanting it to eventually end so as to begin another.
    But they do!
    Especially in this country

    Divorce

    Serial monogamy has always been closely linked to divorce practices. Whenever procedures for obtaining divorce have been simple and easy, serial monogamy has been found.

    As divorce has continued to become more accessible, more individuals have availed themselves of it, and many go on to remarry

    But in this life we all live
    Many of us don't have a legal divorce from our mates
    And many of you are not open about what you do in your vanilla lives
    With your mates
    It's not personal, it's cultural.

    The sexual revolution refers to the well documented changes in sexual behavior throughout the Western world that continue to evolve.

    In general use, the sexual revolution is attributed to the changing trends in social thought, witnessed from the 1960s into the early 1970s. Although the term has been used at least since the late 1920s.

    During the 1960s and 1970s fundamental changes were made on how society viewed its sexuality, heralding a period of de-conditioning away from old world antecedents, and developing new codes of sexual behavior many of which are now integrated into the mainstream. The 1960s and 1970s heralded a new culture of "free love” with millions of young people embracing the hippie ethos and preaching the power of love and the beauty of sex as a natural part of ordinary life. Hippies believed that sex was a natural biological phenomenon which should not be denied or repressed. Changes in attitudes reflected a perception that traditional views on sexuality were both hypocritical and chauvinistic. Sexual liberalization heralded a new ethos in; experimenting with open sex in and outside of marriage, contraception and the pill, public nudity, gay Liberation, liberalization of abortion, interracial marriage, a return to natural birth control and childbirth, women's rights and feminism. [5][6] The perception that all hippies were excessively promiscuous and the sexual revolutionary era was an uncontrolled orgy of group sex is a myth without basis. Many of the era’s countercultural people were celibate due to personal preferences. These choices had nothing to do with issues of morality, but were ones of personal deliberation due in part to spiritual conviction . The consideration that relationships and sex could become distractions upon the path of personal spiritual deliverance, ensured that many hippies refraned from all sexual activity. Celibate hippies were not critical of others who chose the paths of “free love” and “sexual liberalization”. In the late seventies and eighties new won sexual freedoms were exploited by big business looking to capitalise on a more open society, with the advent of public pornography and hardcore.

    Counter forces such as Fraenkel (1992) say that the "sexual revolution", that the West supposedly experienced in the late 60s, is indeed a misconception and that sex is not actually enjoyed freely, it is just observed in all the fields of culture; that's a kind of taboo behavior technically called "repressive desublimation". In his writing Marcuse explores the concept that Establishment sanctioned forms of sensual release, what he calls "repressive desublimation", complete our enslavement on the instinctual level. In order to move from that to an actual sexual liberation, it is necessary a change in our mental structures and our moral inhibitions; instead the Judeo-Christian morals still basically hold, and the small social changes are exaggerated because they are seen in that light. Even most of the self-claimed atheists, have just secularized and internalized the same old morals.

    While the extent to which the sexual revolution involved major changes in sexual behavior is debated, many observers suggest that the main change was not that people had more sex or different types of sex, it was simply that they talked about it more openly than previous generations had done - which in itself can be described as revolutionary by supportive historians.

    Historian David Allyn argues it was a time of "coming-out": about premarital sex, masturbation, erotic fantasies, pornography use, and sexuality. Although this may be true, some historians have doubts on this due to the lack of contraceptives en masse before the common era. This would have made it extremely difficult to cover up pre-marital relations due to extremely high risk of pregnancy.

    It is clear that sexual behavior did change radically for the vast majority of women, but only a generation after the "revolution" had begun. Women reaching sexual maturity after about 1984 have behaviors much more in common with the men of a generation earlier. Some had more partners (two to three times), starting at an earlier age (by three to five years), than women of the 1970s. Nevertheless this rather radical change in actual behavior is rarely reported on, being regarded as no longer newsworthy.

    Most of you in America do not know any better
    Not out of ignorance
    But out of stupidity
    *blank stare*

    "We have come a long way baby"



    Haven't we?

    So let's get back to the more advanced living people
    "The lifestyler's"

    Many of you do not consider yourselves in a lifestyle
    Yet most of you will agree that you have grown to have done your fair amount of "dirt" in your lives

    From freakin
    To sneakin
    To creaping
    To cheating
    To speaking about thinking about something kinky

    Yet, many of you who now call these lifestyles a part of your lives?
    Are still playing the sex game
    "It's not about the sex"
    Sometimes it's just about the attention
    Nobody wants to be lonely
    So they claim that you can own thee
    *snicker*
    But show me where you are doing anything more respectable than I am?
    *LQQKinG*
    (take'n a nap until you absorb the first part)
    *Yawn
    *

    Ok, this is for the advanced sexual lifestyles people
    The rest of you can go sit in the corner and study the first part
    *smirk*

    Ok
    Now that we see how life has changed in the past few years
    Sexually
    A new reality

    And here we are
    Trying to be sexually evolved
    And free to be grown ass adults
    Enjoying all that life has in store for consenting adults
    Of like minds
    And a lust for a more responsible kinky life
    SSC

    So this is where we are in this subject
    "Free love"
    "The revolution was not only televised, it was pod cast!"

    The sexual revolution can be seen as an outgrowth of a process in recent history, though its roots may be traced back as far as the Enlightenment (Marquis de Sade) and the Victorian era (A. C. Swinburne's scandalous Poems and Ballads of 1866).

    It was a development in the modern world which saw the significant loss of power by the values of a morality rooted in the Christian tradition and the rise of permissive societies, of attitudes that were accepting of greater sexual freedom and experimentation that spread all over the world and were captured in the phrase free love.

    Throughout the 1960s and 1970s Sweden was an international leader in what is now referred to as the "sexual revolution", with gender equality particularly promoted during this time..

    Historians argue that the ongoing Sexual Revolution in the new century is continued liberalization after a conservative period that existed between the 1930s and 1950s. They note that the Cold War sparked a socially conformist identity which tended to be self-conscious of its appearance to the outside world. .

    Within the United States, this conformity took on puritanical overtones which contradicted natural or even culturally-established human sexual behaviors. It was this period of Cold War puritanism, some say, which led to a cultural rebellion in the form of the "sexual revolution". Despite this, however, before the 1920s the Victorian era was much more conservative than even the 1930s and 1950s. Due to the invention of TV and the increasingly wide use of it in the 50s, by the 1960s a vast majority of Americans had television. This mass communication device, along with other media outlets such as radio and magazines, could broadcast information in a matter of seconds to millions of people, while only a few wealthy people would control what millions of people would watch.

    Some have now theorized that perhaps that these media outlets helped spread new ideas among the masses.

    A prime example of this occurred during the early 1960s when the Beatles (virtually unknown at the time) came to America and were introduced on the Ed Sullivan show. Once the show was over they were an instant hit.

    Forty million Americans had watched it that night and thus morals in one perspective changed instantly; although obviously it would take longer for this to occur.

    The mass media's broadcasting of new ideas to the population was radical, and during the late 1960s the counterculture was becoming well known on radio, newspapers, TV and other media outlets.

    One suggested trigger for the modern revolution was the development of the birth control pill in 1960, which gave women access to easy and reliable contraception.



    Another likely factor was vast improvements in obstetrics, which greatly reduced the number of women who die in childbirth and thus increases the life expectancy of women.

    Other data suggest the "revolution" was more directly influenced by the financial independence gained by many women who entered the workforce during and after World War II, making the revolution more about individual equality rather than biological independence.

    Many people, however, feel that one specific cause cannot be selected for this large phenomenon.
    And the above is why so many of us are now struggling with the Old Guard while living in a new age

    Many of you have grown to invest your lives in this lifestyle
    Without the common respect for the act of sex

    And sex in now the number one cause of infidelity in this country
    And in these lifestyles

    And many of you are not adult enough to admit it
    That is not a threat
    It's a human trait of this new age we live in right now
    get over it
    understand it
    respect it

    "We are not living your grandmothers life anymore"

    The Industrial Revolution during the nineteenth century and the growth of science and technology, medicine and health care, resulted in better contraceptives being manufactured.

    So for a while, getting a shot was all we needed

    Advances in the manufacture and production of rubber made possible the design and production of condoms that could be used by hundreds of millions of men and women to prevent pregnancy at little cost. Advances in steel production and immunology made abortion readily available.

    So for a while, it was the woman's choice to keep a unwanted child from a sexual encounter.

    Advances in chemistry, pharmacology, and knowledge of biology, and human physiology and all sorts of new drugs led to the discovery and perfection of the first oral contraceptives also known as "The Pill".

    So for a while, it was a woman's choice what she did with her body

    New drugs like Viagra helped impotent men have an erection and increased the potency of others. Purchasing an aphrodisiac and various sex toys became "normal".

    So for a while, it became ok to be over sexual active

    Sado-masochism ("S&M") gained popularity, and "no-fault" unilateral divorce became legal and easier to obtain in many countries during the 1960s and 1970s.

    So for a while, we became more kinky adults

    All these developments took place alongside and combined with an increase in world literacy and decline in religious observances. Old values such as the biblical notion of "be fruitful and multiply" for example, were cast aside as people continued to feel alienated from the past and adopted the life-styles of modernizing westernized cultures.

    So for a while, we became church freaks, jewish freaks, muslim freaks, and just plain ole freaky spiritual people.

    A we lost sight of a old out dated culture

    And failed to respect this new culture we live in today

    The New World Order Of Sexuality of The Ages

    E Pluribus Unum

    From the many we became the one

    American Freaks

    So what is your excuse?




    So why do many of us in these lifestyles suffer the same fate
    As many people in the vanilla world?



    "Maybe it is because we are NOT respecting the basic rules of relationships?"


    There are rules we all try to tell the younger freaks they too need to respect
    Even if we tell them to do as we say and not as we do
    They do
    just like you

    So we owe it to not just ourselves or these lifestyles
    But our next generations to get better in bed
    And in our lives together

    So what are the basic rules?

    In the late 1940s and early 1950s, Alfred C. Kinsey published two surveys of modern sexual behavior. In 1948, Alfred C. Kinsey and his co-workers, responding to a request by female students at Indiana University for more information on human sexual behavior, published the book Sexual Behavior in the Human Male. They followed this five years later with Sexual Behavior in the Human Female. These books began a revolution in social awareness of, and public attention given to, human sexuality.

    It is said that at the time, public morality severely restricted open discussion of sexuality as a human characteristic, and specific sexual practices, especially sexual behaviors that did not lead to procreation.

    Kinsey's books contained studies about controversial topics such as the frequency of homosexuality, and the sexuality of minors ages two weeks to thirteen years. Scientists working for Kinsey reported data which led to the conclusion that we are capable of sexual stimulation from birth.

    These books laid the groundwork for Masters and Johnson's life work. A study called Human Sexual Response in 1966 revealed the nature and scope of the sex practices of young Americans.

    So it is not about who you have sex with
    It is about how you respect who you have sex with

    Many argue that the 1978 elections of Margaret Thatcher in United Kingdom and John Paul II in Vatican, events like the Disco Demolition Night in 1979, the election of US President Ronald Reagan in 1980 and the rise of televangelism marked the beginning of the end of the “liberal wave” that had gradually engulfed the Anglosphere, the Developed World and subsequently the Western World since the late 1950s.

    And with the outbreak of the AIDS epidemy in early 1980s — culminating with the publicly-known death of Rock Hudson in 1985 — marked the return of conservative values into society and the juridical and political questioning of the achievements of Sexual Revolution (see Meese Commission and Bowers v. Hardwick).

    This situation would prevail until the mid-to-late-1990s, when the discovery of more effective ways to control AIDS infections and cultural phenomena like internet pornography made the moral-cultural tide slowly turn again.
    But many of you still consider AIDS more of a homosexual issue today still
    And even the more sexually evolved lifestyle types see this in the same light
    So that means that we have too many people who have no respect for sexuality as a whole still
    Although more of you are educated?
    You still do not know enough to respect what you are doing or not doing

    yet
    You want to respect monogamy?
    You want to respect sexual monogamy?
    You want to respect polyamory?

    There was a few statements that I read in Teal's post
    That I really felt needed to be read again
    Maybe by more intelligent people than many who replied
    *snicker*

    "
    Sexual monogamy is not equal to relationship monogamy. "
    "
    Faithfulness (or 'Monogamy') to a relationship (or marriage) does not have to equate to sexual faithfulness."
    Made by Buck and Wife

    And I have heard these words spoken by family members and friends that have been together forever

    But these rules are deeper for many of us who claim involvement with many of these lifestyles
    Because what we do is not all about sex
    But too many of you have not mastered sex
    So to submit and be Mastered by each other in these sexual lifestyles?
    Can cause major issues and drama between each other
    And the lifestyles in general

    Because you are not following the rules

    The worse abuse ever noted?
    Is selfish abuse
    The need to take more than you give
    And not be concerned with the longterm effects

    And yet you want monogamy?

    For most of you it is too late
    Because you are not virgins anymore

    So you all are serial monogamous
    respect that first

    Too many of you suffer from selfish pride
    To see how you fit in this post
    And as adults
    And that is a deadly sin
    *wicked grin*




    So what good are you to anyone if you do not follow the rules you claim you are about?

    Maybe that is why so many people in these lifestyle are single?
    Or have mates that are not in these lifestyles with you?
    Not that they can not handle it
    But because they can not handle you not feeling that they can handle it too?

    And there is no such thing as being vanilla in these lifestyles
    Once you have learned to respect your own sexuality?
    Once you have found a lust for your own kink?
    Once you have found a lifestyle that fits you?

    You are no longer vanilla
    Because vanilla is a flavor
    Not a lifestyle
    In a lifestyle?
    You can be any flavor you want to be
    SSC

    But if you think that these lifestyles are about sex?
    Then you are not ready to go further than just sex in your lifestyle

    Until you learn the rules
    And how to define who you are in reality

    So you want monogamy?

    What do you have to offer?
    Sex?

    What else you got?











    respect
    0 (0 Ratings)

    How legal should Marijuana really be?

    Tuesday, March 11, 2008, 04:17 PM [General]

    What are the real issues with Marijuana and Medicine?
    What are the real issues with Marijuana and Medicine? magnify
    Yeah I know that many of you are down low weed smokers
    Not all of you
    But most of you at least feel there is little threat
    Of the use of
    Marijuana and Medicine







    So let's look deeper into this subject
    (
    as I go make my self a sammitch)
    *wicked grin*
    Key-Facts.jpg
    • Marijuana is a green, brown, or gray mixture of dried, shredded leaves, stems, seeds, and flowers of the hemp plant (Cannabis sativa). Cannabis is a term that refers to marijuana and other drugs made from the same plant. According to the National Institute of Drug Abuse, marijuana is the most commonly abused illicit drug in the United States.
    • One of the active chemicals in marijuana is THC (delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol). THC is the main component responsible for marijuana's mind-altering effect. For decades, scientists have been studying THC’s potential medical uses to determine its validity and found that it may help treat a variety of conditions including nausea, glaucoma, pain and multiple sclerosis.
    • Medical marijuana advocates argue that marijuana provides medical benefits for cancer and AIDS patients by increasing appetite and decreasing nausea and it has been shown to assist some glaucoma, Parkinson’s and multiple sclerosis patients.
    • According to the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy and opponents to medical marijuana, marijuana use results in problems with memory and learning, distorted perception, difficulty in thinking and problem solving, loss of coordination, increased heart rate, and anxiety. Also, chronic use of marijuana may increase the risk of psychotic symptoms in people with a past history of schizophrenia.
    • Twelve states have compassionate use laws: Alaska, Nevada, California, New Mexico, Colorado, Oregon, Hawaii, Rhode Island, Maine, Vermont, Montana, Washington. In these states, patients with a doctor’s note are protected from state prosecution. Anyone who uses marijuana for any reason is vulnerable to Federal anti-drug laws, arrest and prosecution.
    • According to Americans for Safe Access, several state legislatures are currently considering medical marijuana, including: Illinois, New York, Connecticut, Michigan, Minnesota and Massachusetts.
    • The California Compassionate Use Act provides that certain criminal statutes prohibiting the possession and cultivation of marijuana shall not apply to a patient (or caregiver) "who possesses or cultivates marijuana for the personal medical purposes of the patient upon the written or oral recommendation or approval of a physician."
    • By Federal statute, doctors are presently permitted to prescribe opiate painkillers derived from poppy seeds such as Codeine and Demerol and narcotic drugs such as morphine, but not marijuana. Source: The Controlled Substances Act of 1970, 21 U.S.C. §§ 801 et seq
    • Controlled Substances Act of 1970 established five categories for all prescription and illicit drugs. Marijuana was placed in Schedule I, which defines the substance as having: a high potential for abuse, no currently accepted medical use in the United States, and a lack of accepted safety for use under medical supervision.
    • According to information dated March 30, 2007, from the Colorado patient registry system, the average age of patients registered in the Medical Marijuana program for the state is 43 and patients range in age from 17-80 years old.
    • The White House Office of National Drug Control Policy has stated that marijuana has a high potential for abuse and can incur addiction and serve as a gateway to other drugs. Frequent use of marijuana leads to tolerance to the psychoactive effects and smokers compensate by smoking more often or seeking higher potency marijuana.
    • According to the 2005 National Survey on Drug Use and Health, an estimated 97.5 million Americans aged 12 or older tried marijuana at least once in their lifetimes, representing 40.1% of the U.S. population in that age group. The number of past year marijuana users in 2005 was approximately 25.4 million (10.4% of the population aged 12 or older) and the number of past month marijuana users was 14.6 million (6.0%). Source: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Results from the 2005 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings, September 2006
    • The Institute of Medicine’s 1999 report Marijuana and Medicine: Assessing the Science Base was neither a blanket endorsement nor a dismissal of the medical marijuana use concluding “[C]annabis and its derivatives have shown promise in the treatment of a variety of disorders.” The report said that the active ingredients in marijuana were useful in controlling pain, nausea and lack of appetite in very seriously ill patients. The experts called for further research and development of "safer" pills and inhalers based on chemicals found in marijuana cautioning that marijuana smoke delivers harmful substances found in tobacco smoke. It called for further research to conclusively determine whether habitual marijuana smoking causes cancer.

    http://www.rl.tv/viewpoint/Default.aspx?gclid=COyAqJPZhZICFQEfFQodUDdj8w





    (
    returning with a Cool Aid smile)

    Ok
    I have been thinking of this subject also because I have older parents
    And good friends who are now over the age of 50

    And some of them are on medications for pain and other discomforts
    And watching them struggle over the side effects
    Only to feel less pain or nothing at all mentally

    I started really thinking about what are the real issues
    With Medical Marijuana and how the candidates see this issue
    Being that everyone of them are promoting change

    I wonder what would change in this countries views of Marijuana use
    If Medical Marijuana was prescribed for pain and the symptoms AIDS
    And other illnesses
    Legally

    Because there is no shortage of pot
    For people who smoke pot

    So what about the people who may find some help
    From Hemp
    ?




    But this is a interesting statement right here



    Not that we can expect this kind of vending machine country wide
    But if my family or my friends who are suffering and in need of weed?
    I would go to the store
    And get more than I normally do

    Because unlike you

    If my father or mother would suffer less pain
    I would not complain
    With passing the good shit
    To my own parents
    And they know me
    I don't grow weed

    But I know that we need to think deeper into this election
    Because we need change and protection
    By thinking of the real issues in every direction

    And as I inhale the essence of THC
    I know it aint the Herb that bothers me
    But the stupidity
    Of so many

    Who think the only issues that we think are important
    We have already talked about or heard from the press

    About who is best
    At changing the way we live
    In this country

    Not that this is Amsterdam
    But this country has no shortage
    To help some people live and die more comfortable
    Even if it takes them smoking blunt
    They should have lived long enough to smoke whatever they want

    And with so many "Baby Boomers" becoming elderly

    I think some people are feeling me too

    So what about you?




    How do you feel about the issue of medical Marijuana?

    Do you think that issue is just as important when we talk about health care
    And not try to use the excuse of smoking being bad for your health

    *blank stare*


    I Am
    Mr Ez
    And this is my home of Moanin
    by
    MAN LAW!!!
    again

    AMP
    Sir Ez

    Hafez


    And I wonder what is the real issue with Marijuana
    And me
    *snicker*
    0 (0 Ratings)

    Still blk History Ron Isley and the Isley Brothers

    Sunday, March 2, 2008, 08:54 AM [General]

    Black History still... Ron Isley and the Isley Brothers magnify

    "THE" oldest touring band in music history!
    (I bet most of you didn't know that)

    I wanted to post the history of these brothers
    Because we tend to forget about the accomplishments of our people
    When we are faced with media drama

    So here's their story to date:


    Ronald Isley (IPA: /ˈaɪzliː/) (b. May 21, 1941, Cincinnati, Ohio) is an American pop, rock, soul, and R&B singer and is known as the lead singer and founding member of the legendary family music group The Isley Brothers. He is currently serving time in Federal Prison for tax evasion in Terre Haute, Indiana, according to the Bureau of Prisons website.

    Early life

    Born the third of six brothers, Ronald, like many of his siblings, began his career in the church. He began singing at the age of three, winning a $25 war bond for singing at a spiritual contest at the Union Baptist Church. By the age of seven, Ronald was singing onstage at venues such as the Regal Theater in Chicago, alongside Dinah Washington and a few other notables.

    Beginning of an era

    In 1954, when Ronald was only 13, he and his brothers, Rudolph, O'Kelly and Vernon Isley, formed the original lineup of what would become the Isley Brothers. Beginning as a gospel quartet, they began singing alongside their father, O'Kelly, Sr. (also a singer in his own right at the time), and their mother Sallye (the group's first pianist).

    Ronald carried on as the leader of the Isleys after Vernon's 1955 death in a bicycle accident at age 13. In 1957, the Isleys moved out of Cincinnati and headed to New York City, where they began recording doo-wop material for several record labels. After several failed attempts, the brothers hit pay dirt after cultivating a song that had been created after the brothers' inspired performance of Jackie Wilson's "Lonely Teardrops" at a 1959 Washington, D.C. show. After signing with RCA Records, the group released "Shout!", a song that has since become a legendary rock and roll staple.

    After the 1962 hit, "Twist & Shout", and a brief successful stint at Motown, the brothers formed the T-Neck record label (named after their New Jersey hometown) in 1968 and released the hugely successful funk anthem, "It's Your Thing", which won the group their only Grammy.

    Ronald could sing rock & roll as well as funk and soul. In fact, Ronald is considered one of the original belters and vocalists of the rock era. After years singing in gritty gospel-infused vocals, Ronald introduced R&B audiences to his piercing falsetto and softer tenor in ballads that critics have hailed as some of the greatest love songs of all time, including "For the Love of You", "Harvest For the World", "Sensuality", "At Your Best", "Footsteps in the Dark", "I Need Your Body", "Choosey Lover", "Between the Sheets", and "Don't Say Goodnight." He still sang in his gritty tenor in hits like "That Lady", "Live It Up", "Fight the Power" and "Take Me to the Next Phase".

    After the death of his oldest brother, O'Kelly, in 1986, Isley began working with soul singer-songwriter-producer Angela Winbush on the next Isley Brothers record, Smooth Sailin'. The album was released in 1987. Isley and Winbush shared a duet on Winbush's Sharp album (the top 40 R&B ballad "Hello, Beloved"), and in 1993, they were married. Winbush continued producing records with Isley for 1989's Spend the Night, 1991's The Tracks of Life (with a revamped version of the Isley Brothers), 1996's Mission to Please (from which Isley and Winbush scored a hit duet, "Floatin' On Your Love", whose remix featured Lil' Kim) and 2001's Eternal, before Isley and Winbush divorced in 2001. The former couple remains close.

    Isley also collaborated with Rod Stewart in 1990 on Stewart's cover of the 1966 Isley Brothers hit "This Old Heart of Mine". The collaboration reached #10 on the Billboard Hot 100, one place higher than the original, and also hit #1 on the Adult Contemporary chart.

    Later life

    One of the founding members of the Isley Brothers, he and Ernie remain the only brothers (as of 2006) who remain in the group. His vocals have helped the Isleys become the longest-running charted group in music history. Few bands or artists could get away with having a hit in 1959, and still make hits in the new millennium. Isley has accomplished this feat with the hits "Contagious" (a Top 20 smash in 2001) and the Hot 100 singles "What Would You Do" and "Busted" (released in 2003). He was also was featured singing the hook in Swizz Beatz' "Big Business" and the remix, "Bigger Business".[citation needed]

    Since the 1990s, he has become a sought-after vocalist for hip-hop artists like Warren G, Nas, UGK, Ja Rule and Jay-Z. In 1995, he began collaborating with one of his fans, R&B singer-songwriter R. Kelly, who had a hit duet with Ronald and brother Ernie with "Down Low (Nobody Has to Know)", the first hit by the Isleys in a long time. In the video to the song, Kelly and Isley introduced youngsters to the "Mr. Biggs" character, which has since become a Ronald Isley trademark. The Mr. Biggs character has also been featured in the video of B2K's "Girlfriend".

    In 1992, Ronald was inducted to the Rock & Roll Hall of Fame as the charter member of The Isley Brothers. Most recently, he recorded a solo album with producer Burt Bacharach on the album Here I Am in 2003. The next year, he and Patti LaBelle scored a modest R&B hit with the single, "Gotta Go Solo". Ron Isley also appears on a track with Tupac Shakur called "Po Nigga Blues", as well as "Better Dayz".[citation needed] Both songs appear on posthumous albums.

    After making headlines when he married the background singer, Kandy Johnson, of the sister group, JS, Isley was charged with and convicted of tax evasion charges. The Hollywood Reporter reports Isley was sentenced to 37 months in prison instead of the maximum sentence, which would have sent Isley to jail for 26 years [1]. Isley's sentence was affirmed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.[2][3] Isley is imprisoned at the Federal Correctional Institution at Terre Haute, Indiana, and is scheduled for release on April 13, 2010.[4]

    Isley and his wife are the parents of, Ronald, Jr., his first son. He has a daughter, Tawana, from an earlier marriage

    The longtime lead vocalist for the Isley Brothers, Ronald Isley helmed the influential family group for close to a half century, a period spanning not only two generations of siblings but also massive cultural shifts that heralded their music's transformation from gritty R&B to Motown soul to blistering funk. Born in Cincinnati, OH, on May 21, 1941, as a preteen he joined siblings Rudolph, O'Kelly, and Vernon to form the earliest incarnation of the group. After Vernon's 1955 death in a bicycling accident, Ronald was tapped as the remaining trio's lead vocalist. Early singles stiffed, but "Shout" -- thei